Talk:Bob Kiley

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject iconBiography Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
WikiProject iconLondon Transport Start‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject London Transport, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Transport in London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
 Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.


Is it fair to say that the "fair use" claim is weak for the image on this page? Pcb21| Pete 21:35, 11 Oct 2004 (UTC)

I think it can be considered fair use. The photograph depicts the subject of the article, it is small, the source is credited, there is no loss of income. Seems OK to me, but you can list it on WP:PUI if you want. Neutrality (talk) 21:38, Oct 11, 2004 (UTC)


The article states that since he came to London, Bob Kiley's wife and children have been killed in a car accident, he has remarried and has a new family. I don't remember reading anything of this in the press, so I'm wondering if it is either made up, or possibly old history and in the wrong section. Either way, it needs some kind of source, so I've flagged if 'citation needed'. -- Chris j wood 15:18, 29 April 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Bob Kiley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:12, 4 November 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]